here<\/a> – gated version)\u00a0 a Princeton team, lead by Alexander Todorov, tried to address the issue of the psychological aspects of such inferences.\u00a0 Of course, trait inferences, about trustworthiness for instance, have received extensive research attention in both behavioral and fMRI studies. However, research focusing on a single trait dimension is problematic because trait judgments from faces are highly correlated with each other.<\/p>\n\u00ab\u00a0 For example, two trait judgments \u2013 how caring and how attractive a person is \u2013 accounted for 84% of the variance of trustworthiness judgments that predicted the amygdala activation to faces in an fMRI study of implicit face evaluation. Without independent evidence for the primacy of one trait inference over another, it is equally plausible to argue that \u2018caring\u2019 inferences and attractiveness, rather than trustworthiness, drive the response of the amygdala to faces.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n
Todorov\u2019s group states the problem differently. When we see a certain face, what do we tend to evaluate\u00a0? What kind of dimensions do our inferences take into account ? In order to put aside other affective effects, they recommend studying judgments made from emotionally neutral faces and suggest that \u00ab\u00a0faces are automatically evaluated along the dimensions of valence\/trustworthiness and power\/dominance. These dimensions define a 2D space within which specific social judgments can be represented\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n
They go on and show that \u00ab\u00a0the facial cues used for face evaluation along these dimensions indicate that evaluation of emotionally neutral faces is an overgeneralization of adaptive mechanisms for inferring emotional states with their corresponding behavioral intentions and the ability to implement these intentions \u00bb.<\/p>\n
But does fave evaluation result from inferences based on emotional expressions alone? Sometimes it is based on more physical cues (dominance inferences are based on signs of strength, age, weight, etc.) as the authors notice, without elaborating the point. Unless this is taken into account, their hypothesis won\u2019t explain our attitudes toward baby faces, which we find \u00ab\u00a0cute\u00a0\u00bb be they sad, surprised, angry or happy. And what about our judgements about face shapes\u00a0? Is it possible to find universal features in inferences from physical traits\u00a0to the whole range of personnality traits drawn from them\u00a0? Perhaps there would be \u00ab\u00a0natural\u00a0\u00bb and \u00absocial\u00a0\u00bb aspects, as for emotions.<\/p>\n
Moreover, as (1) the data are obtained in a \u00ab\u00a0blank\u00a0\u00bb context, when subjects have to\u00a0 no decision to take and no goal to pursue, but just have to \u00ab\u00a0evaluate faces\u00a0\u00bb, and as (2) no cross-cultural study is called for, I am a bit sceptical about the methodology. Can one have a \u00ab\u00a0semantic\u00a0\u00bb of facial features, given how much it seems affected by cultural contexts and by specific situtations\u00a0? In the previously quoted paper, A.C. Little and note that, if faces affect hiring decisions and could influence voting behaviour …<\/p>\n
\u00ab changing context from war time to peace time can affect which face receives the most votes (Study 2). Our studies highlight the role of face shape in voting behavior and the role of personal attributions in face perception. We also show that there may be no general characteristics of faces that can win votes, demonstrating that face traits and information about the environment interact in choice of leader.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n
Still, it shows what a great field to explore this is.<\/p>\n
\nReferences<\/strong><\/p>\nA. Todorov, “Reading\u00a0 trustworthiness in faces without recognising faces”, Cogn.Neuro., 25\/3, 2008, p. 395-410.<\/p>\n
Little, A.C. et al. (2007) \u00ab Facial appearance affects voting decisions \u00bb, Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, p. 18\u201327.<\/p>\n
Zebrowitz, L.A. and McDonald, S.M. (1991) \u00ab The impact of litigants\u2019 babyfaceness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts \u00bb, Law Behav. 15, p. 603\u2013623.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
As Dan was noticing last time, the ability to recognize individuals on the basis of faces (and voices) is quite fascinating. The ability to \u00ab read \u00bb unfamiliar faces is no less interesting, albeit quite independant : prosopagnosics with impairments in perception of facial identity, as well as the rest of us, make judgments about […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":910,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Face value - International Cognition and Culture Institute<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n