{"id":537,"date":"2010-05-24T01:00:33","date_gmt":"2010-05-23T23:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=537"},"modified":"2023-08-09T17:02:01","modified_gmt":"2023-08-09T15:02:01","slug":"why-do-we-make-our-tastes-public","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/nicolas-baumard\/why-do-we-make-our-tastes-public\/","title":{"rendered":"Why do we make our tastes public?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Facebook has recently changed the way it asks its users to endorse brands and celebrities on the site. Rather than ask people to “become a fan” of say, Starbucks or Lady Gaga, Facebook will instead let users click to indicate that they “like” the item.<\/p>\n
Facebook already lets people “like” comments or pictures posted on the site, and users click “like” almost twice as much as they click “become a fan.” Facebook says that replacing “become a fan” with “like” will make users more comfortable with linking up with a brand and will streamline the site. The Independent<\/a> quotes Michael Lazerow, CEO of Buddy Media, which helps companies establish their brands and advertise on social networks such as Facebook: “The idea of liking a brand is a much more natural action than [becoming a fan] of a brand. In many ways it’s a lower threshold.”<\/p>\n But while it might seem to be less of a commitment to declare that you “like” Starbucks than to announce you are a fan of it, the meaning essentially would stay the same: Your Facebook friends would see that you clicked that you “like” a page and that\u2019s why users do it anyhow: to advertise their good taste or, to use Bourdieu\u2019s famous term, their \u201cdistinction\u201d (below the break is one of the famous Bourdieusian graphs where cultural and economic capital are related to cultural practices. Although the data are quite old now, it still is fun to plot oneself in this kind of space).<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n \n