{"id":487,"date":"2008-08-28T02:00:48","date_gmt":"2008-08-28T00:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=487"},"modified":"2023-08-01T15:15:27","modified_gmt":"2023-08-01T13:15:27","slug":"crime-without-punishment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/nicolas-knight-blog\/crime-without-punishment\/","title":{"rendered":"Crime without Punishment?"},"content":{"rendered":"
I thought I’d start by posting about something that has been puzzling me of late.<\/p>\n
One of the purposes of criminal law in many countries is to protect individuals, or society at large, from harmful individuals, by means of either punishment (which usually takes the form of jail sentences) or deterrence.<\/p>\n
Duff, in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, says that “Crimes are, at least, socially proscribed wrongs\u2014kinds of conduct which are condemned as wrong by some purportedly authoritative social norm. That is to say that they are wrongs which are not merely \u2018private\u2019 affairs, which properly concern only those directly involved in them: the community as a whole\u2014in this case the political community speaking through the law\u2014claims the right to declare them to be wrongs.”<\/p>\n