{"id":442,"date":"2011-06-03T12:50:16","date_gmt":"2011-06-03T10:50:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=442"},"modified":"2023-07-24T14:19:39","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T12:19:39","slug":"offensive-inanity-in-the-name-of-evolutionary-psychology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/icci-blog\/offensive-inanity-in-the-name-of-evolutionary-psychology\/","title":{"rendered":"Offensive inanity in the name of evolutionary psychology"},"content":{"rendered":"
Satoshi Kanazawa<\/a> has caused a scandal by publishing a blog post (later withdrawn) claiming, with specious evidence, that black women were less attractive than others (and black men were more attractive). His Psychology Today blog has just been closed down. Readers of the hell-raising post will realize that this does not look like the work of a scientist willing to challenge political prejudice in the name of truth. The author obviously relishes provocation, and he was willing to relax the standards of scientific proof to create a stir. Which he did.<\/p>\n As a result, evolutionary psychology as a whole is once more under attack in the media and at the LSE (where Kanazawa is a reader in the management department).<\/p>\n Leading evolutionary psychologists like Robert Kurzban complain <\/a>that a healthy scientific discipline is being pilloried for one researcher’s faults, and refuse to have their field held responsible for all the questionable pop psychology that goes by its name. More than 60 prominent researchers, representing the field, have issued a short text saying that Kanazawa’s bad science does not represent evolutionary psychology<\/a>. Opponents of evolutionary psychology point out that politically dubious speculations still occasionally find an official tribune in the field (see e.g., here<\/a>).<\/p>\n