{"id":418,"date":"2010-03-28T00:00:56","date_gmt":"2010-03-27T23:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=418"},"modified":"2023-07-24T14:33:46","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T12:33:46","slug":"the-social-rationality-of-footballers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/hugo-mercier\/the-social-rationality-of-footballers\/","title":{"rendered":"The social rationality of footballers"},"content":{"rendered":"
Are footballers rational? It all depends on what their goals are (no pun intended). We will not be talking here about behavior outside the field, as it’s not entirely clear what norms of rationality one should use in this case (as George Best put it: “I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.”). However, when playing, footballers seem to have a very clear incentive: winning the game. After all, the indecent salaries of many professional footballers depend on their team winning as many games as possible. Nowhere is the situation as clear-cut as in penalty kicks. The kicker must put the ball into the nets while the goalkeeper must stop him from achieving his goal, period. Surely, the combination of huge stakes and intensive training should produce optimal behavior on both sides of a penalty kick. This is what Michael Bar-Eli and his colleagues have tried to find out in research reported here<\/a> [1].<\/p>\n