{"id":357,"date":"2009-05-07T19:26:01","date_gmt":"2009-05-07T17:26:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=357"},"modified":"2023-07-24T11:59:02","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T09:59:02","slug":"cumulative-culture-in-the-lab-and-chimpanzees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/helen-de-cruzs-blog\/cumulative-culture-in-the-lab-and-chimpanzees\/","title":{"rendered":"Cumulative culture in the lab and chimpanzees"},"content":{"rendered":"
At the recent EHBEA conference held April 6-8 at Saint Andrews, I saw presentations by both Andrew Whiten (a primatologist who specializes on nonhuman cultural traditions, especially in chimpanzees) and Christine Caldwell (who examines cumulative cultural evolution in the lab). It was interesting to see the question of cumulative cultural evolution from these two very diverging perspectives.<\/p>\n
It is now generally established that nonhuman animals, including chimpanzees, macaques and a variety of bird species, display a socially transmitted behaviors, which in humans are termed cultures. However, to date the evidence for cumulative cultural evolution in nonhumans remains sporadic. For example, in the case of nut-cracking chimpanzees in the Ta\u00ef forest, there is little variation in how nuts are being processed, i.e., cracked by means of a hammer and anvil, and whereas some individuals have learned to use auxilliary stones to stabilize the anvil, this innovation has not spread to the entire population. The question is: why not?<\/p>\n