{"id":304,"date":"2010-12-31T00:00:04","date_gmt":"2010-12-30T23:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=304"},"modified":"2023-07-27T19:26:25","modified_gmt":"2023-07-27T17:26:25","slug":"the-smurf-studies-do-7-month-olds-have-a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/davie-yoons-blog\/the-smurf-studies-do-7-month-olds-have-a\/","title":{"rendered":"The Smurf Studies: Do 7-month-olds have a"},"content":{"rendered":"
In a recent paper<\/a> published in Science (24 December 2010) and entitled “The Social Sense: Susceptibility to Others’ Beliefs in Human Infants and Adults”, Agnes Kovacs, Ern\u0151 T\u00e9gl\u00e1s and Ansgar Denis Endress describe a striking set of experiments that may be of interest to ICCI readers, and suggest that “adults and 7-month-olds automatically encode others’ beliefs, and that, surprisingly, others’ beliefs have similar effects as the participants’ own beliefs.” These studies add to a growing empirical literature that started with Onishi & Baillargeon 2005<\/a> and that stands in contrast to Sally-Ann-style studies of false belief<\/a> (which rely on explicit predictions and suggest it is not until 4 or 5 years that children can represent others’ false beliefs). Here, the authors argue that representing an agent’s beliefs — even when they contradict one’s own beliefs, and even when that agent has left the scene — is triggered automatically and may be part of an innate human “social sense.”<\/p>\n Around the Department of Cognitive Science at the CEU in Budapest, these are known as the “smurf studies”, because they all feature a movie with different smurf dolls and a ball that rolls behind an occluder (Figure 1).<\/p>\n