{"id":147,"date":"2010-03-24T00:06:04","date_gmt":"2010-03-23T23:06:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=147"},"modified":"2023-07-24T16:09:27","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T14:09:27","slug":"varieties-of-disbelief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/varieties-of-disbelief\/","title":{"rendered":"Varieties of disbelief"},"content":{"rendered":"
On March 15, the Washington Post website put a link to a small ethnographic study by Daniel Dennett and Linda LaScola entitled “Preachers who are not Believers.” In this remarkable piece, the authors present interviews of five protestant pastors who have lost their faith, and analyse their predicament. This is stirring a growing debate not only at the WaPo website, but also on the religious blogosphere (e.g., here [1]). It is of cognition-and-culture relevance because the interview, the analyses, and the arguments go into fine-grained discussions of the variety of cognitive attitudes involved in \u2018belief’, which, with a few exceptions, have been sorely lacking in the ethnography of religion.<\/p>\n[1] Because I said so_ Pastors who don’t believe in God<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" On March 15, the Washington Post website put a link to a small ethnographic study by Daniel Dennett and Linda LaScola entitled “Preachers who are not Believers.” In this remarkable piece, the authors present interviews of five protestant pastors who have lost their faith, and analyse their predicament. This is stirring a growing debate not […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":677,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n