{"id":111,"date":"2008-10-28T19:07:13","date_gmt":"2008-10-28T18:07:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?p=111"},"modified":"2023-07-24T16:07:03","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T14:07:03","slug":"tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/","title":{"rendered":"Tasty food for anthropological thought"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
\nPicture: Taste buds from Gray’s Anatomy<\/h6>\n

The alleged non-existence of universal colours categories provided a textbook illustration for cultural and linguistic relativism until Berlin and Kay\u2019s published their famous Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution (1969), which has played a major role in the development of cognitive anthropology. On the other hand, the idea of four universal basic tastes, sweet, sour, salty, and bitter, has been generally accepted, even in anthropology. In \u00a0\u201cA study of the science of taste: On the origins and influence of the core ideas\u201d (Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2008), 31:59-75, freely available online) Robert P. Erickson challenges this idea from a neuropsychological point of view.<\/p>\n

Here is the abstract:<\/p>\n

Our understanding of the sense of taste is largely based on research designed and interpreted in terms of the traditional four \u201cbasic\u201d tastes: sweet, sour, salty, and bitter, and now a few more. This concept of basic tastes has no rational definition to test, and thus it has not been tested. As a demonstration, a preliminary attempt to test one common but arbitrary psychophysical definition of basic tastes is included in this article; that the basic tastes are unique in being able to account for other tastes. This definition was falsified in that other stimuli do about as well as the basic words and stimuli. To the extent that this finding might show analogies with other studies of receptor, neural, and psychophysical phenomena, the validity of the century-long literature of the science of taste based on a few \u201cbasics\u201d is called into question. The possible origins, meaning, and influence of this concept are discussed. Tests of the model with control studies are suggested in all areas of taste related to basic tastes. As a stronger alternative to the basic tradition, the advantages of the across-fiber pattern model are discussed; it is based on a rational data-based hypothesis, and has survived attempts at falsification. Such \u201cpopulation coding\u201d has found broad acceptance in many neural systems.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There is a useful outline of the history of the idea of \u201cbasic tastes\u201d, and a section on cross-linguistic evidence.<\/p>\n

Most of the BBS Open Peer Commentaries of the article are from a neurological point of view, but the parallel with the colour case is drawn by in particular by Tony Belpaeme (his abstract: There are striking parallels between the basic tastes debate and the debate on human colour categorisation. Colour categories show a remarkable cross-cultural similarity, but at the same the time exhibit seemingly inexplicable large interpersonal variations. Recent results suggest that colour categories are the result of cultural learning constrained by the neural substrate of colour perception), and a defense of the idea of basic tastes from a linguistic perspective by Asifa Majid\u00a0and\u00a0Stephen Levinson (their abstract: Recurrent lexicalization patterns across widely different cultural contexts can provide a window onto common conceptualizations. The cross-linguistic data support the idea that sweet, salt, sour, and bitter are basic tastes. In addition, umami and fatty are likely basic tastes, as well.)<\/p>\n

Tasty food for thought for students of cognition and culture!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Picture: Taste buds from Gray’s Anatomy The alleged non-existence of universal colours categories provided a textbook illustration for cultural and linguistic relativism until Berlin and Kay\u2019s published their famous Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution (1969), which has played a major role in the development of cognitive anthropology. On the other hand, the idea […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":677,"featured_media":112,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nTasty food for anthropological thought - International Cognition and Culture Institute<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tasty food for anthropological thought - International Cognition and Culture Institute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Picture: Taste buds from Gray’s Anatomy The alleged non-existence of universal colours categories provided a textbook illustration for cultural and linguistic relativism until Berlin and Kay\u2019s published their famous Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution (1969), which has played a major role in the development of cognitive anthropology. On the other hand, the idea […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"International Cognition and Culture Institute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-28T18:07:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-24T14:07:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-content\/uploads\/177816729_71d0d13f10_o.gif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"339\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@dzfsqsd\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\">\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dan Sperber\">\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\">\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\">\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/\",\"name\":\"International Cognition and Culture Institute\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-content\/uploads\/177816729_71d0d13f10_o.gif\",\"width\":600,\"height\":339},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/\",\"name\":\"Tasty food for anthropological thought - International Cognition and Culture Institute\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-28T18:07:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-24T14:07:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/#\/schema\/person\/6d6c8fd5968dd89eb28b9a6bd5e500a9\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/blogs\/dan-sperber\/tasty-food-for-anthropological-thought\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/#\/schema\/person\/6d6c8fd5968dd89eb28b9a6bd5e500a9\",\"name\":\"Dan Sperber\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-content\/uploads\/dan-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Dan Sperber\"},\"description\":\"description\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.dan.sperber.fr\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/dzfsqsd\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/677"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17415,"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111\/revisions\/17415"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cognitionandculture.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}